First of all as a side note, I don’t remember it being on the fact sheet, but Thomas Hardy was an architect! Maybe it’s completely unrelated, or maybe that’s why Hardy was able to express his ideas so well through his writing! He was a “serious, earnest man” that “produced such expressions of contemporaneous thought” like Norris was talking about.
Secondly, in Hardy’s text, right from the beginning we get the about average, decent guy who doesn’t get the girl. He is described as “a young man of sound judgment, easy motions, proper dress, and general good character”. This would be an every day, “average” man that one could meet even in these days. The problem is that most women don’t like this kind of man. The same goes for Bathsheba. She didn’t want this guy either. I think in this instance Norris would agree with the theory that Hardy has in the novel because he is making his point by expressing his characters to be more realistic to modern people. Women are hard to please, and we want either what we can’t have or what isn’t good for us. Hardy is right on the money here. We have a million options, but none that are good enough for us. For Hardy, he is expressing his art through his novel. His thoughts are clearly portrayed throughout the text.

You've brought up some great points. I also thought Hardy's story of Bathsheeba was honest to the way the world works even in modern times. It's sad but true, women are kind of crazy. Especially women like Bathsheeba.
ReplyDeleteYou focused on ideas that never crossed my mind. I like your interpretation of the everyday-ness of Bathsheba's final man. I was trying to make it a hard thing to find everyday-ness in Far From the Maddening Crowd...and you showed me its just under our noses. Excellent!
ReplyDeletearchitects definitely have a systematic way of doing things, it's true.
ReplyDelete